Legislative Hot Topics: Blog

  • Common Core Standards Webinar October 3

    Sep 16, 2011

    Monday, Oct 3, 2011, 8 pm EST 

    Sign up for Common Core Standards Webinar here.


  • 9/7/11: US ED announces Six States winning Striving Readers Grants

    Sep 07, 2011

    From US ED Press Release - September 7th

     

    $180 MILLION AWARDED TO SIX STATES FOR COMPREHENSIVE LITERACY PROGRAM AIMED AT CHILDREN, BIRTH-GRADE 12
     
            More than $180 million in grants were awarded to six states through the Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Program, which helps states pursue a comprehensive approach to improving literacy outcomes for all children -- birth through grade 12, including limited-English-proficient students and students with disabilities.  Thirty-five states applied for the funding.
            Never before have grants been awarded by the U.S. Department of Education for literacy projects aimed at comprehensive state programs that encompass such a broad age range. The six winning states will hold competitions of their own to award 95 percent of the funds as "sub-grants" to local school districts and early learning providers.  The Striving Readers program requires states to use at least 15 percent of their grant funds to serve children from birth through age 5, while 40 percent must go toward supporting students in grades K-5, and 40 percent for middle and high schools with an equitable distribution between the two.  The remaining five percent can be set aside for state administration of the grants.
            "Supporting children’s reading skills can help students build a lifelong love of learning,” said U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan.  “These grants will increase access to strong literacy instruction through innovative approaches by providing states and districts the flexibility they need to identify the literacy programs best suited to meet their students needs."
            The states winning the grants under the Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Program include:
    •       Georgia, $25,650,000.
    •       Louisiana, $28,500,000.
    •       Montana, $7,600,000.
    •       Nevada, $14,250,000
    •       Pennsylvania, $38,000,000.
    •       Texas, $66,500,000
            Funds will support programs that advance literacy skills through professional development, screening and assessment, targeted interventions for students reading below grade level and other research-based methods of improving classroom instruction and practice.
            While only six states will receive discretionary grants, 48 states received formula funding in 2010 to create a state literacy team charged with developing a comprehensive state literacy plan.
            Many of those states have made important progress in establishing literacy teams and developing draft plans that serve the literacy needs of children from birth through grade 12.  The U.S. Department of Education will award a technical assistance contract this fall to provide training and support services to the 48 formula grantees as well as the six discretionary grantees. 
            This will include a grantees’ meeting, webinars, a Summer Literacy Institute, and other types of assistance depending on the needs of the grantees.  The Department also plans to facilitate cross-state collaboration and resource sharing that will allow all states to benefit from the lessons learned as the six grantees implement their plans.  
            Under the administration's FY 2012 budget proposal, reading and literacy programs would be administered under a new effort to be known as the Effective Teaching and Learning: Literacy program.  It would provide competitive grants to states alone or in partnership with other entities (such as nonprofit organizations and institutions of higher education) in order to support comprehensive state and local efforts aimed at improving literacy instruction, especially in high-need schools for children and youth from preschool through grade 12.
    The program would build on the progress the Department seeks to achieve with 2010 funds for the revised Striving Readers program, which replaces reading programs segmented by grade level with a more comprehensive authorization. The program would strengthen education for literacy by ensuring that all the elements of a comprehensive literacy program are embedded in state and local strategies, by strengthening performance expectations, and by supporting the identification and scaling-up of innovative methods of teaching reading, writing, and language arts.
    For more information on the Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Program, visit: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/strivingreaders-literacy/index.html
     

  • Congressional Funding, Teacher Effectiveness & Waivers

    Aug 29, 2011
    August 29, 2011 –

    Several key issues impacting literacy and children are on tap for discussion by the Congress and the Administration as official Washington returns from its August break next week.

    The debate: How much money should be spent by the federal government on education?

    As the new fiscal year begins on October 1st there is no plan or agreement in place. The House of Representatives has allocated 18% less overall for the Departments of Labor/Health and Human Services/Education. The Senate has no set funding level. It is possible that we will face a similar fight for funds this year as was experienced in the spring of this year.

    Of high interest to IRA members is the concept of teacher evaluation.
    This is a cornerstone issue of the Obama administration’s reform agenda. It is also something of high interest to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce. That committee held one hearing on teachers and teacher effectiveness as part of their agenda to have five bills (with teacher effectiveness being one) as their reauthorization of No Child Left Behind. In addition to this issue, many on the committee focused on alternative paths to becoming a teacher─ with high interest in Teach for America.

    Staff in the House is working on several ideas. One of them: There should be funding for professional development but that the content and the processes should not be a federal decision. The Republican staff members are working to try to find how to direct funds to specific parts of the education function without being proscriptive.

    When they complete their work on teacher effectiveness the House committee is then to focus on the accountability issues related to No Child Left Behind. As in their other areas, they want to create programs with accountability for outcomes, not process. However, there continues to be a divide between how to protect the rights of high need populations using ideas such as measuring subgroups. There is an understanding that being too specific is expensive and ineffectual.

    The US Department of Education (USED) is preparing for several announcements. One is to release the names of the states that will be receiving Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Grants. Thirty-four states filed applications for this competitive grant. The $179 million will provide funds to between three (if all large states) to 18 (if all are small states) to conduct professional development programs for teachers working with children from age 0 to grade 12.

    The other USED announcement will be related to waivers for several of the requirements of No Child Left Behind (NCLB). In March the President announced that he wanted a new measure on his desk before the first day of the new school year. This hasn’t happened. In keeping with an announcement by Secretary Duncan in June, states will be able to apply for specific waivers to specific parts of NCLB. However, it will not be as simple as just applying for a waiver. Most likely states will have to commit to working on a reform agenda that includes linking teacher evaluations to student performance.
    USED, in its September 2011 announcement, is expected to make clear the criteria and process for waivers.ype your content here...

Home| About IRA| Contact Us| Help| Privacy & Security| Terms of Use

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Google+ LinkedIn

© 1996–2013 International Reading Association. All rights reserved.